1024! App Reviews

This how you spoil app economics on AppStore. Well done. One star.

After update, game crashes shortly after entering main menu (EXC_BAD_ACCESS SIGSEGV) on my iPhone4s

When you win, you get NaN score, because "2048" card dont give score.. :(

Last version started to fail

Crash at start!!

Nice sound and great concept, PLEASE add the inapp in order to remove the adv, is very annoying!

Shameless rip-off

What do developers who have no ideas do? Rip off people who have good ones.

Terribly shameless clone. Had some good ideas to make it different, but too much of a blatant ripoff. Even worse is the ads and spamming pop ups for other games. Would have been better off making something more unique and charging.

Why would apple let an app like this? This is just a ripoff of threes.

Enjoyably addictive game. Clever concept, simple to play, difficult to master. ….. Lots of reviews complain its a clone of threes, i disagree; I bought that game and this is similar, but the gameplay is different. I _would agree they are exactly the same in the same way that baseball and cricket are the same, and football and rugby are the same; Ball & bats and points, and throwing and catching. … . Gameplay: In 1024 a swipe moves all the tiles, all the way to one side - in three’s, a swipe moves all the tiles only 1 space. In 1024 all doubles match, in threes its a bit more complex. Reminds me of the differences between the card games gin rummy, and say 500 - if you know how to play one, you kinda know how to play the other, but the rules and strategies are otherwise very different. 1024 and the other game both use tiles and sliding, but the variation in the rules is different enough to produce a different gameplay, enjoyment, and strategy. … . I’m also not sure why someone would ‘really like threes’ yet be compelled to go download what they are sure is a clone of the same game? And then take time to write a review.. …. 1024 is fun to play. kudos.

This game is inferior to Threes! in every way. It is obviously trying to capture the charm of Threes, but falls short in its lackluster and unresponsive controls and its use of ads. The gameplay is boring and repetitive. It completely lacks the nuance of Threes; while Threes requires you to match 1s and 2s while keeping your high cards together and compensating for the occasional high bonus card, this game can be won with simple "push everything into the corner" tactics. The player has no control over new tile placement, removing another element of strategy. I got a 1024 in my first (and only) game; Ive played Threes for many hour and still havent found the two highest cards. All in all, if youre looking for a fun, polished, nuanced puzzle game, go buy Threes. Its much, much better than this mediocre piece of crap.

Spend the money on Threes instead. This is a crappy ripoff. The ads are annoying as well.

This toolbag is ruining games for everyone.

love the original Threes

Looks and behaves like a cheap Threes knockoff...probably because it is one. Amazing. "No need to pay for ThreesGames." Yes, how clever indeed.

I low his game sooo much. It passes the time and i always play with my friends to get the highest score.

Unclear what in-app purchases are for, all I know is a screen keeps popping up when I least expect it, telling me I cant make a purchase. For what? Looks cute, nice sounds, but I need a manual or a translator to find out whats up now. Used to be clear and simple. Is this clone of Threes or of 2048? It is much easier than Threes and you have much less control. It is cuter than the 2048 app and the sound is better. Plus, I like the gameplay with the fixed tile! Whatever, I loved the Doge 2048 clone and the Dr Who clone online. Try those too. Haha! Jasons other game is a flappy bird clone!

Lazy game design. Not as good as Threes and never will be.

Why my score is NaN after updating to the latest version?